Irrespective of individual backgrounds, peculiar approaches and specific evaluations of the present age, coping with the concept of Eschaton means traditionally striving to offer a big and consistent eschatological picture. Broadly speaking, the Early Modern Age has proven to be a prolific context for the establishment of several prophetical patterns, whose heterogeneous nature and different connotation (apocalyptical, mystical, etc.) is, in turn, a good indicator of the variety of folkloric, philosophical and sacred sources at play. According to the Conference topic "Religion from the Inside", this Panel aims at investigating the relationship between these various representations of the Eschaton and the "Inside" — intended as the individual and internal framework set in dialogue with the external expectations formalised in the big picture, somehow. Can we explore this "somehow" a bit further? E.g., does the Inside experience itself a change, when the external change occurs? Is the change in the Inside an unavoidable consequence or the necessary premise of this external change? Is there a change at all, or it is just the result of the prophecy at display? Does the unavoidable fulfillment of the prophecy eventually impact on the Inside, in turn? Chair: Marta Quatrale (Freie Universität Berlin)Speakers:Dario Gurashi (Independent Researcher), "Spiritalis generatio": Lefèvre d’Étaples, Lazzarelli and Agrippa on creating souls Marco Giardini (EHESS Paris), “En son second Advent, qui continuellement se faict DEDENS NOUS”: Insights into Guillaume Postel’s conception of the ‚intermediate advent‘ within the hearts and its medieval forerunners Valentina Zaffino (Pontificia Università Lateranense / Rome Global Gateway-University of Notre Dame), Religious Enthusiasm in Cambridge Platonists’ Thought. Henry More’s Enthusiasmus Triumphatus Marius van Hoogstraten (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Restaging the Ecclesiopolitical: The Quasi-Eschatological Temporality of Schleitheim’s two InsidesMarta Quatrale (Freie Universität Berlin), Osiander’s representation of the "Inside" in Soteriological perspective: The inhabitatio as ‘Hypertrophy of the Father’, between Brenz’ assent and Melanchthon’s accusation of Antitrinitarism